Skip to main content
Sign up to updates
FIND A LAWYER
ARTICLE

Enforcement of English Judgments and Costs Orders in the UAE

Following up from our opinion on the letter issued by the UAE Ministry of Justice regarding the enforcement of English judgments in the UAE under the principle of reciprocity (here), in a recent judgment, Invest Bank v El-Husseini and Others [2022] EWHC 3008 (Comm), the Commercial Court has confirmed that there is no real risk of substantial obstacles to or a substantial extra burden (e.g. of costs or delay) in enforcing English judgments in the UAE.

Bryan J, by dismissing a security for costs application by (some of) the defendants, made the following key points:

    1. Reciprocity: He held that it is clear that there is reciprocity of enforcement of judgments between the UAE courts and the English court. He considered the effect of the letter published by the UAE Ministry of Justice on 13 September 2022 and the requirement that the relevant foreign courts enforce UAE judgments in like manner.  The judge found that the letter put beyond any doubt that the requirement to reciprocity is met vis-à-vis the English Court [62];

 

    1. Public policy: He found that enforcement of a costs order is not contrary to UAE public policy, even if the sums awarded are for legal costs. He also noted that the DIFC Courts award legal costs and that the UAE courts enforce arbitral awards which contain awards of legal costs in circumstances where the New York Convention does allow refusal of enforcement on grounds of public policy [87];

 

    1. Jurisdiction: He found no credible basis on which the UAE Court would have any jurisdiction for the specific claims the Bank has brought in the English Court and still less that it would have exclusive jurisdiction [71];

 

  1. Offshore DIFC enforcement: He considered enforcing an English judgment for costs in the offshore DIFC Court and the onshore UAE Court separately. The judge found a straightforward route would be to enforce the judgment in DIFC and then to enforce the resulting DIFC judgment in the UAE [43].

 

Comment

This decision provides comfort to English judgment creditors that there is a straightforward route to enforcement of judgments and costs orders in the UAE, both in the offshore and onshore courts. Further, defendants facing claims before the English courts from claimants resident in the UAE may now find it more difficult to obtain orders for security for costs (often tactical, in addition to practical, in such proceedings).

We have specialist lawyers experienced in acting for UAE individuals and companies before the English courts, including in connection with security for costs applications and enforcement. We have international expertise across all sectors, please contact Russell J Strong if you need advice. 

SHARE

This update is for general purposes and guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should seek legal advice before relying on its content. Greenwoods Legal LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered in England, registered number OC306912. Our registered office is Queens House, 55-56 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3LJ. A list of the members’ names is available for inspection at our offices in Peterborough, Cambridge and London. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA number 401162. Details of the Solicitors’ Codes of Conduct can be found at www.sra.org.uk. All instructions accepted by Greenwoods Legal LLP are subject to our current Terms of Business. VAT Reg No: 161 9287 89.




    By completing and submitting this form, you consent to Greenwoods Legal LLP processing your personal data to provide you with the email update services you have selected and any other materials and information about our services that Greenwoods Legal LLP reasonably believes will be of interest to you. You are free to withdraw your consent at any time by emailing mailinglists@greenwoods.co.uk