Home // Insights & Events // Superior landlords cannot be liable for Rent Repayment Orders
In the case of Rakusen v Jepsen & Others [2023] UKSC 9, the Supreme Court has ruled today that Rent Repayment Orders (‘RROs’) cannot be made against a superior landlord. This will provide some welcome clarity for property guardian providers because it means tenants (or licensees) cannot seek redress from the superior landlord.
In this case, the landlord, Martin Rakusen, was the leaseholder of a flat in London. He granted a tenancy to the Kensington Property Investment Group (‘Kensington Property’). Kensington Property then let out the property without an HMO licence. The tenants applied for an RRO of £26,140 against Mr Rakusen, which the tenants secured at first instance. Mr Rakusen challenged that decision and argued such an application should only be made against the immediate landlord and not him (as superior landlord).
The Upper Tribunal dismissed Mr Rakusen’s appeal, so he appealed further to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal finally found in Mr Rakusen’s favour and agreed an RRO could not be made against a superior landlord. It was then the tenants’ turn to challenge the court’s decision, and they appealed to the Supreme Court.
In its decision today, the Supreme Court held that an RRO cannot be made against a superior landlord but only against the immediate landlord of the tenancy that generates the relevant rent.
This is a Supreme Court decision so cannot be challenged further. It therefore clarifies that tenants (or licensees) cannot seek redress from superior landlords. Remember that directors cannot be personally liable to repay rent to tenants/licensees under RROs either (as confirmed last year in the case of Kaszowska v White [2022]) . In other words, tenants/licensees can only obtain an RRO against the immediate landlord. For most property guardian companies, the property guardian company itself will be the immediate landlord/licensor. Therefore, as ever the utmost caution is needed in ensuring the correct HMO licensing is obtained to avoid property guardians applying for an RRO. On the plus side, it is a selling point to building owners (likely to be the superior landlord), to know they will not be at risk of facing potential liability.
If you have any problems with a property guardian, please get in touch with our Property Disputes specialists.
Related articles
This update is for general purposes and guidance only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. You should seek legal advice before relying on its content. Greenwoods Legal LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered in England, registered number OC306912. Our registered office is Queens House, 55-56 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3LJ. A list of the members’ names is available for inspection at our offices in Peterborough, Cambridge and London. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA number 401162. Details of the Solicitors’ Codes of Conduct can be found at www.sra.org.uk. All instructions accepted by Greenwoods Legal LLP are subject to our current Terms of Business. VAT Reg No: 161 9287 89.
Get in touch with us (*Required fields)
Sign up to updates (*Required fields)